Federal Court: Assertions Are Not Evidence in H&C Applications
- Citation
- 2026 FC 1159
- Decided
- Court file
- IMM-601-25
- Full judgment
- Read the decision
Case Law Overview
Grewal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1159
A 72-year-old widow from India applied for permanent residence from within Canada on Humanitarian and Compassionate (H&C) grounds, citing her establishment with her children and grandchildren. The immigration officer refused the application, finding she failed to demonstrate sufficient establishment, hardship upon return, or a significant negative impact on her grandchildren.
Court Ruling
The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial review, finding the officer's decision was reasonable. The Court affirmed that an H&C application cannot succeed based on uncorroborated assertions in a representative's letter; the onus is on the applicant to provide objective evidence to support their claims.
Key Quote from the Court
Beyond the representative's assertions in the Letter with respect to the identified H&C factors, no evidence was provided to support these assertions. Without more, the Letter is an uncorroborated statement on arguments raised with respect to establishment, hardship and the BIOC... I cannot fault the Officer for concluding that there was insufficient evidence to support the factors to be assessed in the H&C application on this basis. (at para 25)
Expert Takeaways
-
Evidence is King This case is a critical reminder that assertions made in a submission letter, no matter how compelling, are not evidence. Every claim regarding hardship, family ties, financial dependence, or the best interests of a child must be supported by strong, objective, and corroborating documents.
-
The Onus of Proof is on the Applicant The Federal Court reiterated the legal principle that the burden of proof lies squarely with the applicant. It is not the officer's job to seek out missing evidence or give the benefit of the doubt on unsubstantiated claims. A failure to provide evidence will be fatal to the application.
-
Build a Comprehensive H&C Case A successful H&C application goes beyond explaining family relationships. It requires evidence like letters from family members (other than the applicant), medical reports, psychological assessments if applicable, financial records demonstrating dependence, and third-party letters confirming the applicant's role and establishment in Canada.
-
Don't Rely on Arguments About Alternative Pathways While arguing that other immigration pathways like parental sponsorship are uncertain can be part of an H&C submission, it cannot be the central pillar. The core of the application must always be the unique and compelling humanitarian factors, proven with evidence.
There is a deadline on this
That is the window to file an Application for Leave and for Judicial Review at the Federal Court, counted from the day you were notified of the decision. An extension can be requested, but it is granted at the Court's discretion - it is not automatic.
Check my deadlineDoes this ruling apply to your situation?
Tick whatever is true for you. Nothing is sent anywhere - this stays in your browser.
That combination is worth a proper look. It does not mean you have a case - only a lawyer reading your actual documents can say that - but it does mean the question is worth asking before your filing window closes.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration law is complex and subject to change. For advice specific to your situation, please schedule a consultation with a qualified legal professional.
Refused again after reconsideration?
The Federal Court can still review your case — let's talk about your options.
No obligation - we review your documents and tell you if a Federal Court application is realistic.
Questions people ask after reading a case like this
Does this mean my own case will succeed?
No. Every application is decided on its own record. A reported decision shows how the Federal Court has reasoned about a particular kind of error - it does not predict the result of a different file. What it can tell you is whether the problem in your refusal is the kind of problem the Court has been willing to intervene on.
How long do I have to challenge a refusal?
Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act you generally have 15 days to file an Application for Leave and for Judicial Review if the decision was made inside Canada, and 60 days if it was made outside Canada, counted from when you were notified. The Court can extend that period, but an extension is discretionary - it is not automatic.
What actually happens at the Federal Court?
Judicial review has two stages. You file the application and a written record, and a judge decides on paper whether to grant leave - permission for the case to proceed. If leave is granted, there is a hearing. The Court does not re-decide your immigration application; it decides whether the officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. If you succeed, the file is normally sent back to be decided again by a different officer.
Do I have to be in Canada to bring an application?
No. Applicants outside Canada regularly bring judicial review applications, which is why the longer 60-day deadline exists for decisions made abroad. Applicants are not normally required to attend in person.
What happens in the free 15-minute review?
You explain what was refused or delayed and when you were notified. We tell you whether your filing window is still open, which issues in the decision look arguable, and what the realistic options are - including reapplying instead of litigating, where that is the better route. There is no obligation to retain us afterwards.
More Humanitarian & Compassionate (H&C) Grounds rulings
Court Upholds Deportation for Serious Criminality Despite H&C Claims
Federal Court: Minister Cannot Unilaterally Withdraw Evidence From Court Record
Federal Court: 'Better Life in Canada' Not Grounds for H&C Approval
Court: Officers Must Weigh Lost Sponsorship in H&C Cases After Family Violence
Written by
Ali Dadkhah
Ali Dadkhah is a litigator whose practice is dedicated to challenging government decisions at the Federal Court of Canada. He specializes in judicial review, providing a crucial avenue for recourse for individuals and businesses who have faced unfair or unreasonable administrative outcomes. Bilingual legal support in English and Persian (Farsi)