Federal Court Orders IRCC to Pay Costs for Excessive Citizenship Delay
- Citation
- 2026 FC 1122
- Decided
- Court file
- T-962-25
- Full judgment
- Read the decision
Case Law Overview
Hussini v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1122
The Applicant, a Syrian refugee who applied for citizenship as a child in 2019, faced an unexplained delay of over seven years. After he filed a mandamus application to compel a decision, IRCC granted his citizenship, rendering the application moot. The government then moved to dismiss the case entirely.
Court Ruling
While the mandamus application was dismissed as moot, the Federal Court ordered the government to pay the Applicant $2,000 in costs. The Court found that the extensive and unjustified delay constituted 'special reasons' to award costs, even though the primary legal issue was resolved.
Key Quote from the Court
Costs will not provide Mr. Hussini with the explanation that he seeks, but costs do send a signal that excessive delays and a lack of evidence before the Court to demonstrate some justification for an excessive delay in these circumstances are discouraged.
Expert Takeaways
-
Mootness Doesn't Erase Accountability This decision confirms that IRCC cannot escape accountability for unreasonable delays simply by making a decision at the last minute. The issue of costs can remain a live issue, and the Court can still penalize the government for its conduct.
-
Excessive Delay Can Justify Costs Unreasonable and unexplained delays can be considered 'special reasons' under the Federal Courts Rules, justifying an award of costs against the government. Applicants should not be forced to bear the legal fees incurred to address government inaction.
-
Mandamus is a Powerful Tool Filing a mandamus application is often the most effective way to break through prolonged processing delays. In this case, a decision was rendered just two months after the mandamus application was filed, following over seven years of waiting.
-
Document All Inquiries The Applicant's repeated, unanswered inquiries were a factor in the Court's decision. It is crucial for applicants facing delays to create a paper trail by regularly inquiring about their file status through official channels and keeping detailed records.
How long is too long?
There is no deadline to bring a mandamus application - and no fixed number of months that makes a delay unlawful. The Federal Court asks whether the delay is longer than the process reasonably requires, whether you have already asked for a decision and given the department a fair chance to make one, and whether the explanation offered for the wait actually holds up. The published processing time for your application type is where that comparison starts.
Does this ruling apply to your situation?
Tick whatever is true for you. Nothing is sent anywhere - this stays in your browser.
That combination is worth a proper look. It does not mean you have a case - only a lawyer reading your actual documents can say that - but it does mean your delay is worth measuring against what the law expects.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration law is complex and subject to change. For advice specific to your situation, please schedule a consultation with a qualified legal professional.
Think your refusal was unfair?
Federal Court judicial review tests whether the officer's decision was fair and reasonable.
No obligation - we review your documents and tell you if a Federal Court application is realistic.
Questions people ask after reading a case like this
How long is too long before I can go to court?
There is no fixed number in the legislation. The Federal Court asks whether the delay is longer than the process reasonably requires and whether the department has a satisfactory justification for it. The published processing time for your application type is the usual starting point for that comparison - but it is a benchmark, not a legal deadline.
Is there a filing deadline for a mandamus application?
No. Mandamus concerns a decision that has not been made, so the 15-day and 60-day limits that apply to challenging a refusal do not apply here. Delay in bringing the application is still something the Court can weigh, so waiting indefinitely is not cost-free.
Do I have to ask IRCC for a decision first?
Normally yes. One of the requirements is a prior demand for the decision and a reasonable time for the department to respond. Keeping a record of your requests and the replies you received matters, because that correspondence is part of what the Court looks at.
What does the Court actually order if I win?
Mandamus does not decide your application and it does not order an approval. Where the requirements are met, the Court orders the department to make a decision, usually within a set period. The decision itself can still go either way.
Will going to court hurt my application?
Officers are required to decide each application on its merits. Asking the Court to compel a decision does not change the legal test that is applied to your file.
More recent Federal Court rulings
Federal Court: Challenge Admissibility Referral Delays at the Immigration Division First
Federal Court: Officer Must Meaningfully Engage with Systemic Racism Evidence
Court: Past Failures Don't Justify Mandamus if Problem is Now Resolved
Federal Court: IRCC Cannot Destroy PR Card Without Justifying Notice
Written by
Ali Dadkhah
Ali Dadkhah is a litigator whose practice is dedicated to challenging government decisions at the Federal Court of Canada. He specializes in judicial review, providing a crucial avenue for recourse for individuals and businesses who have faced unfair or unreasonable administrative outcomes. Bilingual legal support in English and Persian (Farsi)