Court Orders IRCC to Decide on Study Permit After 2.5 Year Delay
- Citation
- 2026 FC 780
- Decided
- Court file
- IMM-6964-25
- Full judgment
- Read the decision
Case Law Overview
Seyedmahmood Kia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 780
The Applicant sought an order of mandamus to compel a decision on his study permit application for a PhD program, which had been processing for over two and a half years. The excessive delay jeopardized his admission, as he had already deferred his program three times.
Court Ruling
The Federal Court granted the mandamus order, finding the delay unreasonable and unjustified. The Court ordered the Minister to render a decision on the application within 30 days and awarded costs to the Applicant due to the Respondent's conduct.
Key Quote from the Court
As a result, there is nothing before the Court identifying the source of the current delay or providing justification for it. The Respondent has therefore failed to discharge its onus to provide a justification for the delay.
Expert Takeaways
-
The Onus is on IRCC to Justify Delays Once an applicant shows a delay is prima facie unreasonable, the burden shifts to IRCC to provide a satisfactory, evidence-based justification. Failing to file an affidavit or providing outdated information is not sufficient.
-
Counsel's Submissions Are Not Evidence The Court reinforced a critical rule
-
Ignoring Binding Precedent is Risky IRCC's attempt to argue that recent, binding appellate authority (Benison) had 'limited relevance' was rejected by the Court and contributed to an award of costs against the government. Parties must address controlling case law.
-
Costs Can Be Awarded for Unreasonable Conduct The Court awarded costs due to 'special reasons,' including the excessive delay, ignoring the applicant's inquiries, and encouraging the court to disregard binding legal precedent. This highlights that poor litigation conduct can have financial consequences.
How long is too long?
There is no deadline to bring a mandamus application - and no fixed number of months that makes a delay unlawful. The Federal Court asks whether the delay is longer than the process reasonably requires, whether you have already asked for a decision and given the department a fair chance to make one, and whether the explanation offered for the wait actually holds up. The published processing time for your application type is where that comparison starts.
Does this ruling apply to your situation?
Tick whatever is true for you. Nothing is sent anywhere - this stays in your browser.
That combination is worth a proper look. It does not mean you have a case - only a lawyer reading your actual documents can say that - but it does mean your delay is worth measuring against what the law expects.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration law is complex and subject to change. For advice specific to your situation, please schedule a consultation with a qualified legal professional.
Want a second look at your refusal?
We assess IRCC refusals and pursue judicial review at the Federal Court when the decision is unreasonable.
No obligation - we review your documents and tell you if a Federal Court application is realistic.
Questions people ask after reading a case like this
How long is too long before I can go to court?
There is no fixed number in the legislation. The Federal Court asks whether the delay is longer than the process reasonably requires and whether the department has a satisfactory justification for it. The published processing time for your application type is the usual starting point for that comparison - but it is a benchmark, not a legal deadline.
Is there a filing deadline for a mandamus application?
No. Mandamus concerns a decision that has not been made, so the 15-day and 60-day limits that apply to challenging a refusal do not apply here. Delay in bringing the application is still something the Court can weigh, so waiting indefinitely is not cost-free.
Do I have to ask IRCC for a decision first?
Normally yes. One of the requirements is a prior demand for the decision and a reasonable time for the department to respond. Keeping a record of your requests and the replies you received matters, because that correspondence is part of what the Court looks at.
What does the Court actually order if I win?
Mandamus does not decide your application and it does not order an approval. Where the requirements are met, the Court orders the department to make a decision, usually within a set period. The decision itself can still go either way.
Will going to court hurt my application?
Officers are required to decide each application on its merits. Asking the Court to compel a decision does not change the legal test that is applied to your file.
More Study Permit rulings
Federal Court: Vague Fairness Letter Invalidates Misrepresentation Finding
Court Backs Officer: Vague Study Plan and Unproven Funds Sink Study Permit
Federal Court: Security Checks Can Justify Study Permit Processing Delays
Court Rules Officers Can't Act as Career Counsellors in Study Permit Cases
Written by
Ali Dadkhah
Ali Dadkhah is a litigator whose practice is dedicated to challenging government decisions at the Federal Court of Canada. He specializes in judicial review, providing a crucial avenue for recourse for individuals and businesses who have faced unfair or unreasonable administrative outcomes. Bilingual legal support in English and Persian (Farsi)