Federal Court: You Are Responsible for Your Consultant's Misrepresentation
- Citation
- 2025 FC 1686
- Decided
- Court file
- IMM-20004-24
- Full judgment
- Read the decision
Case Law Overview
Grewal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1686
The Applicant's work permit was refused for misrepresentation due to fraudulent documents. In seeking to reopen the case, she placed all blame on her immigration consultant, alleging he submitted the documents without her knowledge and forged her signature.
Court Ruling
The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial review, confirming that an applicant cannot escape a misrepresentation finding by blaming a consultant if they have abdicated their own responsibility. The Court found the applicant failed to exercise due diligence, making her ultimately responsible for the contents of her application.
Key Quote from the Court
The innocent error exception has no application here given that the Applicant wholly abdicated her responsibility to ensure that her application was accurate and complete. It is not objectively reasonable for an applicant seeking immigration status in this country to fail to take actions that are within their control, including making all reasonable efforts to verify the truthfulness and accuracy of all information or documentation submitted on their behalf by a consultant or other third party. (at para 10)
Expert Takeaways
-
You Are Ultimately Responsible This case is a stark reminder that hiring a representative does not transfer your responsibility for the truthfulness of your application. You must be actively involved in the process.
-
Review Everything Before Submission Never allow an application to be submitted without your final review. Demand copies of all forms and supporting documents to verify their accuracy and authenticity.
-
The 'Innocent Error' Defence is Very Limited To successfully argue that a misrepresentation was an innocent error caused by a consultant, you must prove you were diligent and the error was truly beyond your control. Simply being unaware is not enough.
-
Formally Declare Your Representative The Court noted the applicant never formally declared her representative. Properly submitting a Use of a Representative form (IMM 5476) creates an official record and can provide clearer channels of communication and accountability.
There is a deadline on this
That is the window to file an Application for Leave and for Judicial Review at the Federal Court, counted from the day you were notified of the decision. An extension can be requested, but it is granted at the Court's discretion - it is not automatic.
Check my deadlineDoes this ruling apply to your situation?
Tick whatever is true for you. Nothing is sent anywhere - this stays in your browser.
That combination is worth a proper look. It does not mean you have a case - only a lawyer reading your actual documents can say that - but it does mean the question is worth asking before your filing window closes.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration law is complex and subject to change. For advice specific to your situation, please schedule a consultation with a qualified legal professional.
Refused again after reconsideration?
The Federal Court can still review your case — let's talk about your options.
No obligation - we review your documents and tell you if a Federal Court application is realistic.
Questions people ask after reading a case like this
Does this mean my own case will succeed?
No. Every application is decided on its own record. A reported decision shows how the Federal Court has reasoned about a particular kind of error - it does not predict the result of a different file. What it can tell you is whether the problem in your refusal is the kind of problem the Court has been willing to intervene on.
How long do I have to challenge a refusal?
Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act you generally have 15 days to file an Application for Leave and for Judicial Review if the decision was made inside Canada, and 60 days if it was made outside Canada, counted from when you were notified. The Court can extend that period, but an extension is discretionary - it is not automatic.
What actually happens at the Federal Court?
Judicial review has two stages. You file the application and a written record, and a judge decides on paper whether to grant leave - permission for the case to proceed. If leave is granted, there is a hearing. The Court does not re-decide your immigration application; it decides whether the officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. If you succeed, the file is normally sent back to be decided again by a different officer.
Do I have to be in Canada to bring an application?
No. Applicants outside Canada regularly bring judicial review applications, which is why the longer 60-day deadline exists for decisions made abroad. Applicants are not normally required to attend in person.
What happens in the free 15-minute review?
You explain what was refused or delayed and when you were notified. We tell you whether your filing window is still open, which issues in the decision look arguable, and what the realistic options are - including reapplying instead of litigating, where that is the better route. There is no obligation to retain us afterwards.
More Work Permit rulings
Federal Court Upholds Misrepresentation Finding from Single Verification Call
Federal Court Upholds Refusal: Weak Ties Doom Family Reunification Visas
Federal Court Overturns Work Permit Refusal, Citing Lack of Proper Analysis
Federal Court: IRCC Cannot Repeat Flawed Reasoning in Redetermination
Written by
Ali Dadkhah
Ali Dadkhah is a litigator whose practice is dedicated to challenging government decisions at the Federal Court of Canada. He specializes in judicial review, providing a crucial avenue for recourse for individuals and businesses who have faced unfair or unreasonable administrative outcomes. Bilingual legal support in English and Persian (Farsi)