Case Law
ICT Refusal Upheld: Court Stresses Corporate Veil in Business Immigration

ICT Refusal Upheld: Court Stresses Corporate Veil in Business Immigration

Application for Judicial Review Dismissed
Citation
2025 FC 1540
Decided
Court file
IMM-8254-24
Full judgment
Read the decision

Case Law Overview

Gharibdoust v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1540

An Iranian business owner sought an Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) work permit to establish a Canadian subsidiary. The officer refused the application, citing a lack of evidence for the parent company's financial ability to support the expansion, an unproven employer-employee relationship, and insufficient proof of the applicant's relevant experience.

Court Ruling

The Federal Court dismissed the judicial review, finding the officer's decision was reasonable. The Court affirmed that personal bank statements are not a substitute for corporate financial documents and that the burden is on the applicant to clearly prove all eligibility requirements, including specific experience.

Key Quote from the Court

Mr. Gharibdoust and SPNTC are separate legal entities, and therefore his personal bank statement does not meet the requirements of the Operational Manual. The Applicant's submissions fail to acknowledge the differences between personal and corporate funds and the clear requirements of the Operational Manual.

Expert Takeaways

  • Respect the Corporate Veil For business immigration applications like ICT, the parent company must demonstrate its own financial capacity. Relying on the owner's personal funds is a critical error, as officers and the Court treat the individual and the corporation as separate legal entities.
  • Evidence Must Be Explicit The burden is on the applicant to prove every claim. Do not expect an officer to make assumptions or connect dots. If claiming specific experience, like interior design, provide detailed evidence of your personal role and contributions, not just general project photos.
  • Formalize the Employer-Employee Relationship Even for business owners, a clear employer-employee relationship with the parent company must be demonstrated with evidence like employment contracts and regular salary payments. A title or corporate registration is insufficient on its own.
  • Address Every Program Requirement This case shows that a deficiency in one area (e.g., finances) can be fatal, but officers will often identify multiple weaknesses. A successful application must be strong on all fronts

There is a deadline on this

15 days
if the decision was made inside Canada
60 days
if the decision was made outside Canada

That is the window to file an Application for Leave and for Judicial Review at the Federal Court, counted from the day you were notified of the decision. An extension can be requested, but it is granted at the Court's discretion - it is not automatic.

Check my deadline

Does this ruling apply to your situation?

Tick whatever is true for you. Nothing is sent anywhere - this stays in your browser.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration law is complex and subject to change. For advice specific to your situation, please schedule a consultation with a qualified legal professional.

Want a second look at your refusal?

We assess IRCC refusals and pursue judicial review at the Federal Court when the decision is unreasonable.

Book a Consultation Contact Us

No obligation - we review your documents and tell you if a Federal Court application is realistic.

Questions people ask after reading a case like this

Does this mean my own case will succeed?

No. Every application is decided on its own record. A reported decision shows how the Federal Court has reasoned about a particular kind of error - it does not predict the result of a different file. What it can tell you is whether the problem in your refusal is the kind of problem the Court has been willing to intervene on.

How long do I have to challenge a refusal?

Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act you generally have 15 days to file an Application for Leave and for Judicial Review if the decision was made inside Canada, and 60 days if it was made outside Canada, counted from when you were notified. The Court can extend that period, but an extension is discretionary - it is not automatic.

What actually happens at the Federal Court?

Judicial review has two stages. You file the application and a written record, and a judge decides on paper whether to grant leave - permission for the case to proceed. If leave is granted, there is a hearing. The Court does not re-decide your immigration application; it decides whether the officer's decision was reasonable and procedurally fair. If you succeed, the file is normally sent back to be decided again by a different officer.

Do I have to be in Canada to bring an application?

No. Applicants outside Canada regularly bring judicial review applications, which is why the longer 60-day deadline exists for decisions made abroad. Applicants are not normally required to attend in person.

What happens in the free 15-minute review?

You explain what was refused or delayed and when you were notified. We tell you whether your filing window is still open, which issues in the decision look arguable, and what the realistic options are - including reapplying instead of litigating, where that is the better route. There is no obligation to retain us afterwards.

Ali Dadkhah

Written by

Ali Dadkhah

Ali Dadkhah is a litigator whose practice is dedicated to challenging government decisions at the Federal Court of Canada. He specializes in judicial review, providing a crucial avenue for recourse for individuals and businesses who have faced unfair or unreasonable administrative outcomes. Bilingual legal support in English and Persian (Farsi)

Stay informed

Follow Ali Dadkhah on LinkedIn

Visa or PR refused? Stuck for years? We challenge IRCC at the Federal Court - judicial review & mandamus.

Follow on LinkedIn